|
Executive
Summary
• The Newspaper Society represents the regional newspaper industry.
Its members publish around 1,300 titles targeting different regions,
cities, towns and neighbourhoods across the UK. Regional and local
newspapers play a crucial role for the communities they serve: by
providing news and essential information, by enabling local businesses
to reach their customers effectively and efficiently, and by leading
campaigns on local issues as the voice of their communities. In
short, the regional press has a long heritage of building substantial
public value without recourse to public funding.
• The
industry’s ability to sustain this role over the long term is at
risk from the BBC’s planned expansion in local and regional media.
Far from remedying an instance of market failure, this expansion
will more likely precipitate one. In spite of long standing discussions
with both the Government and the BBC, as well as a detailed submission
to the Graf Review of BBC online, we do not believe that this risk
is widely understood. This document sets out the context behind
these concerns, as well as the Newspaper Society’s recommendations
for safeguarding long-term plurality in the provision of local news
and information services.
1.
The regional press at the heart of local communities
• Ofcom,
DCMS, the BBC and many consultation respondents have underscored
the importance that audiences attribute to locally-focused news
and information. The Newspaper Society concurs with this view. Our
own research and experience confirms that people’s interests and
activities remain firmly rooted in their local communities, in spite
of the proliferation of news, information and entertainment from
across the UK, and around the world.
•
The regional press have long been at the forefront of meeting this
need. Local newspapers have earned the trust of their communities
through decades of service to readers and to local businesses. Their
commercial model funds an extensive – and expanding – “infrastructure”
of over 13,000 editorial staff who don’t just write about their
communities, but live, work and interact in them. No other medium
is as uniquely positioned to understand and reflect the granularity
of local life across the UK. “Ultra-local” is our USP.
2.
Evolving local media landscape
•
Local newspapers are market – rather than product – driven. Historically,
the industry’s ability to serve their local markets with multiple
media “products” has been restrained by cross-media regulation.
Emerging technologies and convergence are eroding these constraints,
and offer a rich potential to expand and enhance local media offerings
in future. From a broadcaster’s perspective, this could mean far
more localised TV services than the analogue terrestrial network
could allow. From a regional press perspective, it will mean complementing
our traditional content and service portfolio of text and pictures
with audio, video and interactivity.
•
The blurring of media boundaries bring opportunity, but also harsher
competition. The regional press have invested and innovated to meet
this challenge, as have many of our competitors in the commercial
arena. While different newspaper groups will pursue different strategies
across different digital media platforms, the underlying migration
from the printed page alone to print alongside TV/PC or mobile phone
screens is a fundamental trend for our industry, and an imperative
for its long term viability.
3. BBC market impact
•
This migration is under threat from the BBC’s “ultra-local” ambitions,
and the experience of BBC Online suggests a track record of interpreting
a widely drawn remit as a mandate for dominance of a nascent medium.
•
Yet it is far from clear that the BBC is best placed to spearhead
the development of local digital media – other than by its privileged
access to risk-free public funding. Indeed, the BBC does not come
close to matching the depth of resource that local newspapers have
deployed in their communities for decades. As a result, its “ultra-local”
TV service may ultimately resort to sourcing stories from local
newspapers, and repackaging them for TV.
•
The regional press is therefore less concerned about competition
from a BBC striving to offer more or better local news. It is very
concerned, however in how the BBC will compete in delivering that
news – namely through unfair recourse to scale economies at a national
level, guaranteed funding, cross-promotional muscle, privileged
distribution, and strong brand association with TV – as well as
occasional forays into local magazine publishing.
•
At a stage when local online or TV services are starting to become
commercially viable, a large scale BBC rollout could undermine the
business case for commercial innovation, and distort investment
decisions. Over the long term, local digital media could be restricted
to effective monopoly provision by the BBC, as innovation, choice
and diversity fail to develop. This will likely occur through a
combination of inflating costs, undercutting subscription-based
revenue models, and preventing commercial ventures from achieving
the necessary critical mass of audiences to attract local advertisers
to new digital media.
4.
Safeguarding plurality over the long term
•
The Newspaper Society welcomes Ofcom’s aspiration to preserve long-term
plurality in local PSB – but would extend the definition to include
non-broadcast media that also perform a public service role in local
communities. We urge DCMS to consider the following proposals for
the Charter Review White Paper:
i.
Reject the BBC’s proposed model of large-scale rollout of “ultra-local”
TV / broadband internet to 50-60 cities at this stage of the market’s
development.
ii.
Deny additional licence-fee funding for either “ultra-local” TV
or for further development of the BBC’s “where I live” sites. iii.
Ensure greater transparency in the BBC’s investments in local services
through publication of detailed accounts for these services
iv.
Deploy public funding to research/pilot programmes of local commercial
media services on digital platforms – and publish the findings in
the public domain.
v.
Where publicly-funded pilot programmes are conducted by the BBC
– such as the Midlands local TV trials – ensure that the BBC both
involves local media groups in the design/execution of the pilot,
and publishes all findings in the public domain.
vi. Ensure that any future decisions on extending local BBC services
be contingent not only on a public value/market impact test, but
also on the completion of Ofcom’s review of local TV postswitchover
and on a public consultation of the role for commercial media in
light of its findings.
vii.
Confirm that public value/market impact tests be undertaken by Ofcom
and not the BBC trust, and that the process for conducting these
assessments be open to public consultation.
viii.
Reframe the BBC’s eventual remit in local communities as a cautious
and selective intervention in certain areas – be they specific localities,
types of service or audience segments – where there is clear evidence
that commercial models will not be sustainable.
ix.
Define a clear “exit plan” for any new BBC services that are approved
– namely a set of measurable and transparent criteria under which
the original justification for BBC intervention ceases to be valid,
and at which point the BBC is compelled to withdraw from the provision
of these services.
x.
Define specific areas where the BBC should offer assistance to local
commercial media in their migration from traditional to digital
media platforms. This might include facilitating distribution, providing
access to the BBC’s output and archive on favourable commercial
terms, or promoting emerging commercial ventures.

|